The Original Airstream E-mail List
Archive Files
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [A/S] Type construction.
- To: AirstreamList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [A/S] Type construction.
- From: openrx <openrx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:42:44 -0800
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Delivered-To: mailing list AirstreamList@yahoogroups.com
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=0AnGM8RVSuuNnTpSbbDKGsOwUMPtNv4iED+S5F2XoD7FhHUUwnoFlvTfopKlO8iTovA2w/tyOLE1scP84hqWlwsfZrGHsujFikQKy1XV4OKr3TJlvu5pmuE9LYExez6GbRm3wv7AL/63KEMcg8JKwivGjwxOoHlvtSyTVTH5nis= ;
- In-Reply-To: <ct9cpe+8om4@eGroups.com>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:AirstreamList-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
- Mailing-List: list AirstreamList@yahoogroups.com; contact AirstreamList-owner@yahoogroups.com
- Reply-To: AirstreamList@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hi andy
thanks for the quick reply. chris mentions the issue of slides; i intended
to include that in my question about modern units but go so excited, i
forgot.
i suspect that the slide models started life with 5 sections (top, ends,
curbwall and floor) made just like the other units and with the same
structural properties, but that the road wall and lower frame were beefed
up for the slide. again this seems more like body on frame and less like
even semi monocoque....or at least more 'semi er'....
i realize the skin still has some structural contribution....and a true
monocoque has great shear and torsional stength but poor bending and little
compression strength. this is partly why i connected my question to the
bike rack post. on vintage trailers bending loads attached outside the
trailer would seem to be risky as your experience tells us. i just wonder
how it applies to newer units. i also wonder how many folks with rear
separation had lots of stuff piled inside the rear but took it out before
going to the trailer doctor?
vintage airstreams would seem to rely more on skin structural
strength...the virtues of these trailers are.....light weight, high
strength to weight ratio, open space without vertical beams and of course
the beauty outside. but vintage airstreams were never meant to carry much
or pull anything externally attached.
on the other airstream site someone posted recently that gvwr for late 2005
models/2006 has increased by more than 1000lbs, while dry weight has
actually decreased or stayed the same. the 30/31s are now rated at
10,000lbs with a carrying capacity of 2500lbs or more. apparently they have
increased the axle rating to 5000lbs for each with a total of 10k. i
assume this is a real capacity increase and not just a 'rating' change.
i can see how building each wall/roof/end cap module separately could be
more efficient and even to a higher quality since the segment can be idealy
positioned for the worker. so i understand why the factory might change
construction methods.
i just wonder how much the skin contributes to overall strength now and if
they beefed up the lower frames for this higher gvwr and the slides.
thanks again and i won't belabor this issue.
regards
openrx